Jump to Navigation
Subscribe to This Blog's Feed

Silver Spring Criminal Defense Law Blog

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Public believes people with beards more likely to commit crimes

Imagine hearing about a brutal rape, who comes to mind when you think about who did it? If you are like most people, it seems you thought about a man with a beard. There is now scientific evidence that supports the claim that people in Prince George's County believe that men with beards are more likely to be guilty of some kind of sexual assault than beardless men.

There have been numerous studies that indicate that many people have very negative perceptions about men with beards. One study shows that people perceive a bearded face to be more threatening or angry when making a mean expression than the same face making the same face while clean-shaven. Scientists believe that facial hair draws attention to and amplifies the threatening characteristics of a man's face and makes the overall jaw size look bigger.

What does the genetic nature of psychopathy mean for criminal guilt?

The image of a psychopath strikes fear into the hearts of many people in Rockville. The idea that someone would do whatever he or she wants, regardless of who gets hurt, is indeed frightening, but there is some question as to whether psychopaths can be held totally responsible for their actions. After a recent article documented psychopathic tendencies in children as young as three, it calls into question whether a psychopath's actions can truly be helped.

Scientists who have spent years studying psychopaths have noted that those diagnosed with this condition's amygdalas don't function at the same level as non-sociopathic people. In addition, they have much lower levels of cortisol, both of which prevent them from feeling shame, fear and the other emotions that keep most people from committing violent crimes.

High school students charged with felony sex crimes

When many people in Washington, D.C., hear the word "voyeurism" they most likely think of a Peeping Tom, not two teenage high-school students. Unfortunately for these two young men, however, they have been charged with a felony sex crime after police say they videotaped their teacher.

Being charged with a sex crime is extremely serious. There are horrible consequences both inside and outside of the legal system for anyone accused of, charged with or convicted of a sex crime. First, many people are automatically assumed to be guilty by members of the public, tarnishing a reputation in mere moments. Second, the penalties associated with sex crimes are quite severe, including years in prison and serious fines. Finally, many people in Maryland who are convicted of a sex crime will be forced to register as a sex offender.

When are sexual abuse cases too old to prosecute?

Each state has its own rules on when a case becomes too old to prosecute, and while Maryland's laws may be different than any other state's, many people may believe that there is just a point where evidence would be too stale to have a fair trial. Whether that is at the five-year mark, 10 years or 20 years, there are some states that allow prosecutors to bring a sexual abuse case 43 years after the incident apparently took place.

It is a cornerstone of the American legal system that anyone accused of a crime will have a fair trial and will only be convicted if the prosecution can prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant did what it said he or she did. Much of this depends on credible, trustworthy evidence. The longer the time period between an alleged incident and a trial, the more likely it will be that evidence will become stale and witnesses will be harder to find or it will be difficult for them to clearly remember what they saw or heard.

Hazing in Maryland: a rite of passage or a violent crime?

Even though our state has classified "hazing" as a misdemeanor punishable by up to six months in jail, a $500 fine or both -- you can be certain that hazing rituals still take place at the University of Maryland and other colleges in the Silver Spring area. In the vast majority of cases, no one is seriously injured, no one dies and no one is charged with a violent crime. In the stories that make the news, however, serious injuries and deaths are almost always involved.

This week, hazing was back in the headlines as prosecutors in another East Coast state file criminal charges against 13 people in connection with the hazing-related death of a university marching band member.

Does forensics actually do more harm than good?

What would you do if police brought you in for questioning and said that they had forensic evidence that placed you at the scene of a crime? While many people in Montgomery County may think that forensic evidence is a way to accurately determine who is guilty and who is not, a report by The Washington Post calls into question just how true that is.

Imagine being on trial for a sexual assault. Your emotions would be running high and you would be extremely nervous and anxious. It doesn't matter that you didn't do it, you are still scared that you have been accused and are being questioned for a very serious crime. Now, the police insist that you take a polygraph test to see if you were lying about not being involved in the crime.

What happens when blood alcohol tests are found to be inaccurate?

If you have been pulled over for drinking and driving in Silver Spring, you may have been forced to take a blood test to determine if you were legally intoxicated. While police and prosecutors use the results to determine if your blood alcohol content is over the legal limit, blood tests are not always accurate.

An investigation into more than 1,700 blood tests is underway after the employee who was responsible for testing and reporting blood alcohol content was fired for inaccurate reporting. Once a few inaccuracies were reported, all of the blood that he had tested became suspect. Now, his former toxicology lab has been forced to test all 1,700 samples that he already tested.

Internet mug shots meant to shame people before conviction

Anyone in Maryland who has been stopped by police, arrested and spent the night in jail knows how embarrassing it can be to deal with a drunk driving charge. Just because a Montgomery County resident has been arrested, however, doesn't mean he or she has been or ever will be convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol; a mug shot doesn't mean a person is guilty of anything. Sadly, not everyone realizes this and many websites are now capitalizing on it.

Even if someone hasn't done anything wrong, it may be embarrassing to have one's picture on the internet with a criminal charge. For people in sensitive jobs, such as teachers, there is a huge pressure to remove any trace of an arrest and many Internet entrepreneurs are putting mug shots online with the apparent goal to charge exorbitant prices to remove the picture.

Should man convicted of intoxicated murder be put to death?

Maryland still hast the death penalty and anyone who is convicted of a particularly violent crime could find him- or herself sentenced to death, but what about those people who are put on death row for crimes that aren't quite heinous enough to warrant a death sentence?

In this story, there is some question about whether a man who was convicted of murder should be sentenced to death. The man's case is now being considered in order to determine if there are a sufficient number of cases with similar facts that ended in capital punishment to support his death sentence.

Prosecutors come back for more: man sentenced to longer prison term

Many people in Silver Spring know that someone can't be tried twice for the same thing. The principle of double jeopardy protects everyone in Maryland from multiple trials for the same actions, but double jeopardy does not prevent prosecutors from appealing a guilty verdict in order to get a harsher punishment.

Imagine being sentenced for a violent crime in Maryland and receiving a prison sentence. With the exception of an appeal on your part, you expect that you won't be appearing before a judge again and certainly wouldn't receive a more severe punishment, but that is just what has happened to one man who had previously been sentenced to 10 years in prison for using his Cadillac Escalade as a weapon.